Skip to content

Monday, June 19, 2017

June 19, 2017
EVENT>Monday Afternoon Pairs   |SESSION>Monday Aft   |SECTION> A
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>June 19, 2017      |CLUB NO.>233981    | 06/19/2017 16:16
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Chris Lane      |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 80% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   42.0 |TOP>   3 |MP LIMITS>None/1000/500  |CLUB>Kaw Valley Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=8/B=3/C=3                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Klee Zaricky           Chris Lane               A    .     .     .     33.50  39.88
 2 Joane Nagel            Dave Chipman             A    1     .     .     52.00  61.90  0.80(A)
 3 Jolene Andersen        Patrick Musick           C    .     .     .     36.00  42.86
 4 Jerry Sloan            Lois Clark               A    .     .     .     38.50  45.83
 5 Marc Elster            Jean Khatib              C    .     1     1     39.00  46.43  0.24(B)
 6 Janice Hollowell       Mary Fenlon              A    2     .     .     51.50  61.31  0.56(A)
 7 Grant Sutton           James Masilamani         A    3     .     .     47.50  56.55  0.40(A)
 8 Dick Shaffer           Melissa Moore            C    .     .     .     38.00  45.24

                                          Totals                         336.00

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N 3 400 3.00 0.00 2-Nagel-Chipman 4-Sloan-Clark
2 NT S −1 50 2.00 1.00 8-Shaffer-Moore 1-Zaricky-Lane
3 NT× S −1 100 0.50 2.50 3-Andersen-Musick 7-Sutton-Masilamani
3 NT S −2 100 0.50 2.50 5-Elster-Khatib 6-Hollowell-Fenlon

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 NT N 4 180 3.00 0.00 2-Nagel-Chipman 4-Sloan-Clark
2 NT N 3 150 2.00 1.00 8-Shaffer-Moore 1-Zaricky-Lane
3  N 4 130 0.50 2.50 3-Andersen-Musick 7-Sutton-Masilamani
2  N 4 130 0.50 2.50 5-Elster-Khatib 6-Hollowell-Fenlon

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT S 4 430 3.00 0.00 3-Andersen-Musick 7-Sutton-Masilamani
4  N 4 420 2.00 1.00 2-Nagel-Chipman 4-Sloan-Clark
2  N 2 110 0.50 2.50 5-Elster-Khatib 6-Hollowell-Fenlon
2  N 2 110 0.50 2.50 8-Shaffer-Moore 1-Zaricky-Lane

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
4  W −2 200 3.00 0.00 2-Nagel-Chipman 4-Sloan-Clark
3 NT E 3 600 2.00 1.00 5-Elster-Khatib 6-Hollowell-Fenlon
3 NT E 4 630 0.50 2.50 3-Andersen-Musick 7-Sutton-Masilamani
3 NT E 4 630 0.50 2.50 8-Shaffer-Moore 1-Zaricky-Lane

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
6  W −2 100 2.50 0.50 4-Sloan-Clark 1-Zaricky-Lane
6  W −2 100 2.50 0.50 8-Shaffer-Moore 2-Nagel-Chipman
6  E 6 980 0.50 2.50 3-Andersen-Musick 5-Elster-Khatib
6  E 6 980 0.50 2.50 6-Hollowell-Fenlon 7-Sutton-Masilamani

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
5  S 5 400 3.00 0.00 3-Andersen-Musick 5-Elster-Khatib
3  S 5 150 1.50 1.50 4-Sloan-Clark 1-Zaricky-Lane
4  S 5 150 1.50 1.50 6-Hollowell-Fenlon 7-Sutton-Masilamani
4  S 4 130 0.00 3.00 8-Shaffer-Moore 2-Nagel-Chipman

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
4  W −1 100 3.00 0.00 6-Hollowell-Fenlon 7-Sutton-Masilamani
4  E 4 620 1.00 2.00 3-Andersen-Musick 5-Elster-Khatib
4  E 4 620 1.00 2.00 4-Sloan-Clark 1-Zaricky-Lane
4  E 4 620 1.00 2.00 8-Shaffer-Moore 2-Nagel-Chipman

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
4  N 6 480 2.50 0.50 3-Andersen-Musick 5-Elster-Khatib
4  N 6 480 2.50 0.50 6-Hollowell-Fenlon 7-Sutton-Masilamani
4  N 5 450 1.00 2.00 4-Sloan-Clark 1-Zaricky-Lane
4  N 4 420 0.00 3.00 8-Shaffer-Moore 2-Nagel-Chipman

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
4  S 4 420 3.00 0.00 4-Sloan-Clark 6-Hollowell-Fenlon
2  S 4 170 1.50 1.50 5-Elster-Khatib 2-Nagel-Chipman
3  S 4 170 1.50 1.50 8-Shaffer-Moore 3-Andersen-Musick
4  S −1 50 0.00 3.00 7-Sutton-Masilamani 1-Zaricky-Lane

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT S 7 720 2.50 0.50 4-Sloan-Clark 6-Hollowell-Fenlon
4 NT S 7 720 2.50 0.50 7-Sutton-Masilamani 1-Zaricky-Lane
3 NT N 4 630 1.00 2.00 8-Shaffer-Moore 3-Andersen-Musick
3  S 5 150 0.00 3.00 5-Elster-Khatib 2-Nagel-Chipman

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
4  N 5 450 2.00 1.00 4-Sloan-Clark 6-Hollowell-Fenlon
4  N 5 450 2.00 1.00 5-Elster-Khatib 2-Nagel-Chipman
4  N 5 450 2.00 1.00 7-Sutton-Masilamani 1-Zaricky-Lane
4  N 4 420 0.00 3.00 8-Shaffer-Moore 3-Andersen-Musick

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
3  S 4 170 2.50 0.50 7-Sutton-Masilamani 1-Zaricky-Lane
3  N 4 170 2.50 0.50 8-Shaffer-Moore 3-Andersen-Musick
2 NT S 2 120 1.00 2.00 4-Sloan-Clark 6-Hollowell-Fenlon
2  E −1 50 0.00 3.00 5-Elster-Khatib 2-Nagel-Chipman

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
2  E 5 150 2.50 0.50 6-Hollowell-Fenlon 3-Andersen-Musick
3  W 5 150 2.50 0.50 8-Shaffer-Moore 4-Sloan-Clark
3 NT W 4 630 1.00 2.00 1-Zaricky-Lane 2-Nagel-Chipman
3 NT E 5 660 0.00 3.00 5-Elster-Khatib 7-Sutton-Masilamani

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
2  N 6 170 3.00 0.00 6-Hollowell-Fenlon 3-Andersen-Musick
3  N 4 130 2.00 1.00 8-Shaffer-Moore 4-Sloan-Clark
2  N −2 100 1.00 2.00 1-Zaricky-Lane 2-Nagel-Chipman
2 × N −3 500 0.00 3.00 5-Elster-Khatib 7-Sutton-Masilamani

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 × N 5 990 3.00 0.00 6-Hollowell-Fenlon 3-Andersen-Musick
4  N 4 620 2.00 1.00 5-Elster-Khatib 7-Sutton-Masilamani
4  W −1 50 1.00 2.00 8-Shaffer-Moore 4-Sloan-Clark
5  N −1 100 0.00 3.00 1-Zaricky-Lane 2-Nagel-Chipman

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
3  S 4 130 3.00 0.00 6-Hollowell-Fenlon 3-Andersen-Musick
4  N −1 50 1.50 1.50 1-Zaricky-Lane 2-Nagel-Chipman
3  N −1 50 1.50 1.50 8-Shaffer-Moore 4-Sloan-Clark
4  N −2 100 0.00 3.00 5-Elster-Khatib 7-Sutton-Masilamani

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
2  E −1 50 3.00 0.00 2-Nagel-Chipman 3-Andersen-Musick
3 × S −1 100 2.00 1.00 6-Hollowell-Fenlon 1-Zaricky-Lane
2  W 3 140 0.50 2.50 7-Sutton-Masilamani 4-Sloan-Clark
2  W 3 140 0.50 2.50 8-Shaffer-Moore 5-Elster-Khatib

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
3  E −3 150 3.00 0.00 6-Hollowell-Fenlon 1-Zaricky-Lane
2 × W −1 100 2.00 1.00 8-Shaffer-Moore 5-Elster-Khatib
2  W 2 90 1.00 2.00 2-Nagel-Chipman 3-Andersen-Musick
1 NT S −1 100 0.00 3.00 7-Sutton-Masilamani 4-Sloan-Clark

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
4  N 6 480 3.00 0.00 6-Hollowell-Fenlon 1-Zaricky-Lane
4  N 5 450 1.50 1.50 2-Nagel-Chipman 3-Andersen-Musick
4  S 5 450 1.50 1.50 8-Shaffer-Moore 5-Elster-Khatib
3 NT S −2 100 0.00 3.00 7-Sutton-Masilamani 4-Sloan-Clark

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 NT E 1 90 3.00 0.00 7-Sutton-Masilamani 4-Sloan-Clark
1 NT E 2 120 1.00 2.00 2-Nagel-Chipman 3-Andersen-Musick
1 NT E 2 120 1.00 2.00 6-Hollowell-Fenlon 1-Zaricky-Lane
1 NT E 2 120 1.00 2.00 8-Shaffer-Moore 5-Elster-Khatib

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
2  W 5 150 3.00 0.00 7-Sutton-Masilamani 2-Nagel-Chipman
2 NT E 5 210 2.00 1.00 3-Andersen-Musick 4-Sloan-Clark
3 NT E 5 460 0.50 2.50 1-Zaricky-Lane 5-Elster-Khatib
3 NT E 5 460 0.50 2.50 8-Shaffer-Moore 6-Hollowell-Fenlon

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
3  E −1 100 3.00 0.00 8-Shaffer-Moore 6-Hollowell-Fenlon
4  S −1 50 2.00 1.00 7-Sutton-Masilamani 2-Nagel-Chipman
4 × S −1 100 1.00 2.00 3-Andersen-Musick 4-Sloan-Clark
2  E 2 110 0.00 3.00 1-Zaricky-Lane 5-Elster-Khatib

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
3  W 5 200 3.00 0.00 8-Shaffer-Moore 6-Hollowell-Fenlon
3 NT E 3 600 2.00 1.00 3-Andersen-Musick 4-Sloan-Clark
4  W 6 680 1.00 2.00 7-Sutton-Masilamani 2-Nagel-Chipman
3 NT E 6 690 0.00 3.00 1-Zaricky-Lane 5-Elster-Khatib

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 NT E −2 100 3.00 0.00 7-Sutton-Masilamani 2-Nagel-Chipman
3 NT E −1 50 2.00 1.00 3-Andersen-Musick 4-Sloan-Clark
2 NT E 3 150 1.00 2.00 1-Zaricky-Lane 5-Elster-Khatib
3 NT E 3 400 0.00 3.00 8-Shaffer-Moore 6-Hollowell-Fenlon

Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
4  N 4 420 2.50 0.50 1-Zaricky-Lane 3-Andersen-Musick
4  S 4 420 2.50 0.50 4-Sloan-Clark 5-Elster-Khatib
3  S 5 200 1.00 2.00 8-Shaffer-Moore 7-Sutton-Masilamani
2  N 2 110 0.00 3.00 2-Nagel-Chipman 6-Hollowell-Fenlon

Board 26
East Deals
Both Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
2  E 3 140 1.50 1.50 1-Zaricky-Lane 3-Andersen-Musick
3  W 3 140 1.50 1.50 2-Nagel-Chipman 6-Hollowell-Fenlon
2  W 3 140 1.50 1.50 4-Sloan-Clark 5-Elster-Khatib
3  W 3 140 1.50 1.50 8-Shaffer-Moore 7-Sutton-Masilamani

Board 27
South Deals
None Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
4  N 4 420 2.50 0.50 2-Nagel-Chipman 6-Hollowell-Fenlon
4  N 4 420 2.50 0.50 8-Shaffer-Moore 7-Sutton-Masilamani
1 NT N 4 180 0.50 2.50 1-Zaricky-Lane 3-Andersen-Musick
1 NT N 4 180 0.50 2.50 4-Sloan-Clark 5-Elster-Khatib

Board 28
West Deals
N-S Vul

Contract Score Matchpoints Pair Pair
N-S E-W N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N 3 600 3.00 0.00 1-Zaricky-Lane 3-Andersen-Musick
3  N 5 150 2.00 1.00 2-Nagel-Chipman 6-Hollowell-Fenlon
4  N −1 100 1.00 2.00 8-Shaffer-Moore 7-Sutton-Masilamani
5  N −2 200 0.00 3.00 4-Sloan-Clark 5-Elster-Khatib
Advertisements

From → Game Results

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: